The Concept of Individuals Responsibility To other Members of Their Essay

The Concept of Individuals Responsibility To another(prenominal) Members of Their Community by Peter Singer - Essay ExampleBy taking a run across at the donations from such an angle these countries generosity tin can be said to take a drastic dive when compared to their other expenses. One could say that these governments care more than about their transport system for deterrent example than they do about the millions of lives that they could affect with such money (Singer). However, in realistic terms especially from an frugal point of view, it is necessary that a government invests in projects that will bring back financial returns in a bid to provide a better stable economy from which they can operate from. Without these investments, they would not be able to donate any money to the causes that they provide funding for. Taking a get wind at the strength brought about by Singer and the economic defense of such actions by the governments it can be said that two clear sides e merge from this argument with each supporting the opposing sides. A good strategy to determine whether Singer was right in his evaluation of an individuals state to other members of their community as healthful as a governments responsibility to beau monde is by studying the underlying factors that would more or less govern the potential results of what certain actions whitethorn bring. This can be done by setting a choice of two potential paths that a society can take and the results that these two paths are most likely to yield. By doing this, it can be said that the path that leads to the best results will be the better option. Taking a look at the basis of the argument taken by Singer it can be said that from an overall sentiment he has a good point and if his plan was to be shoesd perfectly into action in that respect could be a high chance of success should everyone play their part. This is to say that the effect should take place from the grassroots and make its way up to the top echelons of government. This would mean that a regular individual would unhorse to take more interest in the plight of refugees and ensuring that they are doing everything in their power to improve their conditions. This would complicate donating more money to affiliated organizations, taking a political interest in the policies as well as changing their lifestyle to a more giving and generous one (Singer). The government on the other hand would divert more of their funds towards helping these causes and concentrate more on the offbeat of these individuals rather than the other projects they have lined up (Singer). The government in this case would take the stance that the improvement of human life is more important than other issues. If this was to happen exactly as utter there could be a chance that causes such as the wellbeing of refugees will get the direction it deserves and as a result their plight may be significantly reduce as more population take action on the matter. However, this would need the support and co operation of all the people and bodies involved which would also include a somewhat drastic in some change in mindset which is something that would not happen overnight. People would need to be willing to change their ways and buy out a giving policy that may have diminished over the years thanks to the progress of capitalist values. The changes entailed could also bring about negative aspects as well as positive ones, which is something that should be taken into consideration. As much as helping others and ensuring tha